One evening in the summer of 2004, this is the event of the event at Supercom in Chicago in Chicago.According to the people at the scene, middle -aged Chinese visitors began to walk between the almost uninhabited exhibition booths.Then, when I opened the lid of an expensive network device, I tried to take a picture of the internal circuit board inside.
警備員が男性の行動を制止し、メモリースティック、写真、AT&Tに帰属するデータや図表が記されたノート、富士通ネットワークコミュニケーションズやノーテル・ネットワークスなど6社のリストなどを押収した。
The man claimed to the event staff as the engineer ZHU Yibin.His name tag from his neck was written as "WeiHua".The man explained that the spelling before and after the workplace, Huawei, was reversed.According to Peter Haywood, a co -founder of Light Reading in the telecommunications field, this engineer appeared in a wrinkled clothes the next day, and this was the first time he came to the United States.He said he did not know the rules of Supercom, which is prohibited.
Haywood, who interviewed this man as part of the event coverage of the light reading, recalled, "He was a person with the opposite impression of James Bond."I didn't think, but I guess he had the wisdom to impress. "
After that, Huawei has been the main factor of the unnamed trespasser, from China's largest international high -tech company, the world's largest telecommunications equipment manufacturer, the leader of the 5th generation mobile communication system (5G), and the superpower.Grew up to.Huawei currently employs 188,000 people in more than 170 countries, sells more smartphones than Apple, provides cloud services, produces microchips, and operates a sea submarine cable that supports Internet communication around the world.There is.
In the process, Huawei has been criticized for the rise of the company as imitation and theft.The fact that a number of interviews in the US Federal Court in the Court of the United States Court, which had been interviewed for US officials, former employees, competitors, and partner companies, emerged as a result of competitiveness.It was a corporate culture of Huawei where the border between the means to do and ethics was ambiguous.
People who criticize Huawei point out the company's methods that are widespread and vulnerable.It is an example of a relative of Huawei's founder, Nobuannon, who worked in Motorola, who brought detailed confidential information on Motorola's technology at a meeting in Beijing.
The U.S. government is now increasing pressure on Huawei.The U.S. government has seen the company overtaking world competitors at once and scattering national security risks.The Trump administration last week has taken measures last week to break the relationship between Huawei and the US company, which has become an important supplier for the company, and to ban the Huawei business in the United States.
The Trump administration believes that Huawei, like other Chinese companies, has to follow the Chinese government's orders.He also believes that the company's status as a world's number one telecommunications equipment manufacturer has become a powerful weapon for the Chinese Communist Party, which is concerned with US officials in recent years.This is the driving force for regulatory measures against Huawei.
According to the US security authorities, around 2012, Huawei's US facilities have a confidentiality room that cannot be eavesdropped using electronic devices.This was similar to the facilities of the world's information authorities, which contributed to US authorities' alertness.
Huawei claims that no spy activity is performed for any government, and US authorities have not provided evidence that Huawei spy activities in cyber space.The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China has stated that the law of the country will not force Huawei to play.
Huawei has the most common patents in the world, which is essential for 5G standard technology.The company claims that it has been working on the law in the global market through e -mail, and has been repeatedly innovating."We respect the value of intellectual property rights, as well as our own business, but also our peers, affiliated companies, and competitors."
Until a few months ago, officials have acknowledged that the US Huawei measures were not unified.U.S. companies did not want authorities to deal with them because they wanted to continue trading with China.
Robert Read, a contract engineer in Huawei's Sweden office from 2002 to 2003, said, "they were all flexible to stealing technology."It's a work to imitate. "
ファーウェイによれば、同社の昨年の研究予算は152億ドル（約1兆6600億円）だった。S&Pグローバル・マーケット・インテリジェンスのデータによれば、研究予算がこれを上回っている企業は、グーグル、アマゾン、サムスン電子だけだ。ファーウェイは2018年までの10年間で、研究開発部門の人員を約8万人に倍増させた。
Huawei was trying to make it inconspicuous at the beginning of the country.In the United States, he initially used the name Futureway, set his office in Santa Clara, Texas in 2001 and Santa Clara, California in 2002.He still uses this company name in R & D projects in the United States.When he entered Stockholm, which was at the top in Europe, which was dominant in network technology at the time, Huawei chose a location opposite Ericsson across the street.However, for four years, he used the company name Atelier.
"I didn't want to raise a signboard in the Swedish office in 2004 to 2017 from 2004 to 2017," said, "I didn't want to raise a signboard that informs you that there is Huawei here."I'm talking.
According to former employees, the staff of the Huawei office was instructed to recruit rival companies, but did not work at first.Therefore, Huawei has begun to scrutinize rival network equipment.According to Reed, the Stockholm office had concealed foreign devices in a confidential basement to prevent electronic information leaks.Some of them were transported to China and were broken down by engineers.
These secret rooms were provided in all of the Huawei Empire.According to American officials, Huawei had made such a confidential room in the back of offices in various places, such as Texas.
Information agencies believe that Huawei treated information like a national information agency about the existence of these rooms.There was a strictly managed confidential hierarchy, relying on a safe communication path with the Chinese government.
Huawei argues that this confidential room was to prevent spy of the company, and did not allow spy to other companies.
Theft and industrial spy are relatively common in the world's high -tech industry.Huawei is not the only company that is blamed for theft of foreign intellectual property.He pointed out that the critical direction of Huawei is the malicious of theft that makes the company special.
In January 2003, 18 months before Supercom's turmoil, Cisco appealed to Huawei for copying the company's software and manual.At this time, Huawei was the first to compete in international trials over theft.
Cisco said in a trial, "They copied all of the Cisco user manuals without changing each word."According to Cisco, the company's manual is enclosed in the router, and the company's software is visible while the router is moving.Therefore, the two were easily copied.
According to the trial, Huawei inadvertently copied Cisco's software bugs because the copy was too wide.
"The Huawei could not ship the router until the router was modified a fairly common bug in the router," said Ched Reynolds, a manager in charge of Huawei.He was afraid that he was stolen.Cisco refrained from commenting.
According to a person who is familiar with this, Cisco's Mark Chandler Legal Advisor headed to Shenzhen with evidence of Huawei's theft to confront him.There was evidence that Cisco's manual type mistake remained in Huawei manual.
Nijin listened to the story with no expression and replied, "It's a coincidence.""We will not disclose information about unofficial business meetings as one of the trusted companies," said Cisco's spokeswoman.
Huawei acknowledged that he had copied a part of Cisco's router software and settled in a lawsuit with Cisco in July 2004.A month later, Huawei revealed that Light Reading had fired ZHU, who had a turmoil at Supercom.I tried to contact him, but I couldn't.
According to former employees, Niso, who sought results, had visited Atelley several years in the first few years since its establishment.
According to Reed, Ericsson announced Reof, and he was given a wad of a local currency, Sweden Crona, and went to a bar near Sista Station on the subway.Say.To enjoy drinks to high -tech human resources.In 2010, Huawei established a research base in the southern part of the country.According to Jake Strom, it was a few months after Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications announced that Lund would lay off 450 employees.
Dotcom Crash, which occurred at the end of the 20th century, received the benefit of mass recruitment instead of being hit.William Pr been, who was in charge of government work at the company's Washington Office, said in an interview this year, "Many of these human resources were suddenly abandoned. Everywhere was hit. What is magical?It wasn't. It's just the timing. "
According to David Hikkkkkkkkkon, a federal prosecutor in the western part of Pennsylvania, the US company with Chinese companies is concerned about the stealing of technology, but the formula in consideration of the possibility of gaining profits, and the stealing of corporate secrets.He hesitated to make a claim.Many, however, were informal of the US authorities for help.
One of the officially filed companies was Motorola based in Chicago.In July 2010, Motorola, who has invested in China for 20 years, appealed to Huawei for stealing SC300 technology.The SC300 is a simple base station that connects terminals in the wireless network, which can be installed inside the building or in rural areas.
Seven years ago, Mr. Ban Shao, a relative of Niso, who worked in Motorola, flew to Beijing with two colleagues.According to Motorola, the mission was that Ban secretly showed the SC300 specification to Huawei.
Huawei has been in the Illinois Federal Court, and Mr. Ban has told him that he has been informed of the product development of his team, customer reactions, and his intention to leave Motorola.The company has denied that Ban and his team have developed products for Huawei.I asked Ban for a comment, but there was no response.
According to the e -mail fragments that was restored from Mr. Ban's laptop and added to Motorola's complaint, Ban sent a document about the specifications of the SC300 requested by Mr. Ni.Was written.Huawei later manufactured similar small devices (weighed half of SC300) and sold in rural areas in emerging countries.
The US authorities arrested Kinkan Ki, one of the people who had been conspiring with Ban in February 2007.At the Chicago International Airport, he stopped Kim, who had more than 1,000 documents, including Motorola's corporate secrets, and a one -way ticket to Beijing.In July of that year, the Federal Investigation Bureau (FBI) interviewed Mr. Ni, but could not judge whether they were discussing theft.The Ministry of Justice refused to publish the FBI investigation results.In 2012, the federal government was convicted of Kim for the sin of the secretary of a corporate secret.
By that time, Motorola had withdrawn the appeal.The Ministry of Commerce has prolonged the anti -trading (violation of the Exclusive Law) on a project to sell the network equipment business to Nokia Siemens Networks for $ 1.2 billion.Analysts believe this is a retaliation act through the Ministry of Commerce.Motorola was doing business in China, and the Ministry of Commerce had an influence on this.
According to Michael Wesel, a member of the U.S. -China Economy and Security issues Review Committee, said, "China is an antitrust, anti -money laundering (fund cleaning), and national secrets.He uses a method to retaliate to a large number of companies and shock the industry. "
In April 2011, Chinese authorities approved the sale of the Motorola network business.This was a week after Motorola agreed with Huawei.Motorola and the authorities asked for comments, but no answer.
Nevertheless, there was no suspicion of theft.David Barker, the highest technical director of Quintel Technology, who develops an antenna for network, attended a meeting with Canadian telephone terrace in 2015.Then, the people on the terrace explained the new technology "User Specific Tilt" provided by Huawei.
Barker had never heard of "User Specific Tilt".It increased the number of signals from the antenna and adjusted the inclination, increasing the accuracy of communication by mobile phones.
However, Barker had conceptually heard about the same technology, "Per User Tilt."According to Quintel, a trial that Huawei's misuse was used, it was created seven years ago.According to Quintel, it was a technique shared with Huawei in September 2009 after Huawei proposed a business alliance.
But the partnership between Huawei and Quintel did not happen.One month after the first meeting with Quintel, Huawei submitted a document to obtain a patent of this technology concept, but one of the documents was printed with the name of "Quintel" and "Open.The word "secret" was described.
Last year, Quintel agreed to reconcile in the court after three years of lawsuit.Brent Arbin, a former engineering director of the company, said that the settlement was included in the "permanent secretary clause."Other Quintel officers did not answer the comment request.
そのころになるとファーウェイは、欧米の大半の技術上の競争相手をしのぐようになり始めた。その勢いを背景に、米側は徐々にではあるものの協調的な対応をするようになった。事情に詳しい複数の人物によれば、米当局者はAT&Tに対し、ファーウェイに発注する4Gの契約を撤回するよう働き掛けた。米政府は同盟国・地域に対しファーウェイとの関係を避けるよう要請を行い、米領グアムや日本およびその他地域にファーウェイとのビジネスをやめるよう求める協議のため当局者を派遣している。
The 2012 parliamentary report stated that Huawei was a national security threat.However, the company strongly denied the report.Congress reports were not enough to stop the company's business.
According to Portuguese and multimedia producer Louis Oliveira (45), he visited the U.S. Business Headquarters of Huawei in Texas in 2014 in 2014.The reason was that the officers of the company were interested in the patent of the attachment camera for smartphones.
According to Oliveira, two Huawei officers explained his product in a conference room surrounding 12 -legged chairs.Oliveira is expecting a licensed production by Huawei, and as a reference price of the product 99..I proposed $ 95.
Huawei told Oliveira, "Let's talk later."Three years later, a friend of Portugal told me why Huawei is selling your camera.Oliveira's reaction was "Huawei? It is impossible. What is it?"
And Oliveira saw a photo of Huawei products.The front (square -shaped) front had a slope from the center to the end, and the four corners were rounded.Huawei's camera was substantially inseparable with Oliveira's patent.The retail price is 99.It was $ 99.
"I thought I was stolen," said Oliveira.
When he tried to talk to the Huawei side about the issue, the company's executives took over and taught.He warned that he would file a lawsuit.
Conversely, in March, Huawei filed a non -violent lawsuit in Texas in March.In this case, Huawei has been dissatisfied with Oliveira's extensive position to gain an advantageous position.The company mentions Oliveira's claim in a document submitted to the court, but claims that his patent has not infringed.This lawsuit has not yet been settled.
According to former former employees, Huawei puts a fierce pressure to the employees.Mr. Ni writes the words that drove employees on the internal portal site, but the content is comparable to Huawei's international mission to military actions.
According to the indictment of the United States and the former officials, the engineers of Huawei China headquarters have been studded with foreign staff and the words "Kindly Reminder (just confirmation)".Through email, we repeatedly demand foreign data including confidential information.Huaway refused to comment.
U.S. mobile phone giant T -Mobile has previously developed a technology called "tappy" used for smartphone tests.It was a device that resembled a person's finger quickly, and was inspected by smartphone reactions.In response, Kumasa Shinpuku, a Huawei engineer living in the United States, received a request to acquire information on the device duplicate manufacturing method for nine months for 9 months.According to the U.S. prosecutor, Kuma was instructed by Huawei and stealed some of the tappy information in May 2013.
We will deliver the notable articles of the day together.(Delivery date: Monday to Friday)
購読Huawei, who was filed by T -Mobile, fired them, saying that Kuma and one colleague had "acted on their own discretion."In September 2014, T -Mobile filed a lawsuit against Huawei for stealing the secretary secret, and was $ 4.8 million in the jury trial (in May 2017).
In January this year, the Federal Prosecutor charged the Federal Court in Seattle, Washington, and repeated T -Mobile's claim.Huawei has denied his prosecution.
The U.S. Department of Justice issued a statement and said, "The question of the federal crime in civil lawsuits, how serious it is, or whether the law has been judged.It is not a solution. "
